Overall objectives:

1 - Know the electronic scientific sources
2 - Organize research protocol based on electronic scientific sources
3 - Collect systematized information from scientific sources
4 - To acquire knowledge about the tools of elaboration of text and bibliographical reference
5 - Use tools for writing and for reference
6 - To deepen knowledge on the elaboration of scientific text
7 - Determine what factors contribute to a good quality of a scientific article

Syllabus:

1 - Electronic scientific sources as a resource for the construction of the scientific text
1.1 - Elaboration of the research equation
1.2 - Search by keywords and / or descriptors
2 - Writing and bibliographic reference tools
3 - Components and Characteristics of Writing a Scientific Article
3.1 - Analysis of examples of these components
3.2 - Strategies for writing the components of a scientific article

Literature/Sources:

American Psychological Association , 2010 , Publication manual of the American Psychological Association ,
E. Ethel Schuster, H. Levkowitz, O. N. Oliveira Jr (eds) , 2014 , Writing Scientific Papers in English Successfully: Your Complete Roadmap. , Gráfica e Editora Compacta: São Carlos
M. F. Fortin, , 2009 , Fundamentos e etapas do processo de investigação , Lusodidacta.
O. N. Oliveira Jr , 2014 , As Linguagens do Conhecimento. , Editora Cubo: São Carlos
O. N. Oliveira Jr , 2015 , A técnica da escrita científica: ,
A. Pereira, C. Poupa , 2016 , Como escrever uma tese, monografia ou livro científico usando word , Edições Sílabo
P. Reiz , 2017 , Manual de tecnicas de redação cientifica (4ª Ed.). Paulo: Hyria , Paulo: Hyria
J. Schimel , 2012 , Writing science , Oxford University Press.

Assesssment methods and criteria:

Classification Type: Quantitativa (0-20)

Evaluation Methodology:
Considering the student as the center of the teaching / learning process, the use of expository-interactive methods is recommended, as well as the practical application through examples of research in electronic sources and analysis of scientific articles. The sessions will be complemented with the use of scientific databases and reference tools. Given the theoretical-practical and seminar nature of this CU, the evaluation will include two evaluation elements with the same weight, that is, 50% each: a written test and a written work with presentation and oral discussion. The minimum grade in each element is 9.5 points. If it is lower, the student can recover at the time of appeal. In times of resource / improvement and special, proceed as follows: for the resource each of the components, or both, can be recovered; for improvement, the evaluation will focus on the whole matter.